|
Teachers top punctuation poll |
|
Written by Administrator
|
|
Nov 17, 2008 at 06:53 PM |
|
Almost half of us can't use the possessive apostrophe according to an independent poll of nearly 2000 people in the UK by SpinVox [writing this article's going to be fun!]. 46% of those faced with "people’s choice" in the poll's test incorrectly thought that in the given context it was wrong.
Teachers have often been criticised for their standard of English but in this poll they came out top with over 80% getting full marks. In second place came journalists and PR people. On average women got higher marks than men and they also claimed to care more about incorrect punctuation.
The poll also asked which mistake makes good punctuators the most annoyed. Among those who have mastered punctuation the poll found that the use of "they’re" where "their" is required is the most irritating. Not surprisingly, using an apostrophe to indicate a plural, for example, "boy’s" instead of "boys" came next. After that was confusing "its" and "it's".
Professor Christopher Mulvey from the Museum of the English Language at Winchester University, admits that confusion is forgivable: "The problems people have with apostrophes arise from the hopeless state of English punctuation and spelling. The situation is so confusing that people panic and hypercorrect."
One controversial finding was that those over 55 (who "benefitted" from formal grammar lessons) came out worst of the age ranges.
If all this is making you feel paranoid about your ability to punctuate you can visit www.apostrophe.fsnet.co.uk to find out more. |
|
Last Updated ( Nov 17, 2008 at 07:03 PM )
|
|
|
Creationism in the classroom |
|
Written by Administrator
|
|
Nov 13, 2008 at 08:22 PM |
|
A recent survey by Teachers TV suggested a third of teachers believe creationism should be given the same status as evolution in the classroom. The poll of 1,200 teachers found that almost a third (30%) already consider creationism or intelligent design, to some extent, during science lessons.
Furthermore almost 90% believe they should be allowed to discuss the subject in science if raised by a pupil, as suggested by leading biologist and education expert the Rev Professor Michael Reiss in September. The comment led to his resignation from the post of director of education with the Royal Society with the society claiming what he said had damaged its reputation.
Far from promoting Creationism Prof Reiss's argument was that banning the subject from the classroom was likely to backfire with children who hold sincere beliefs.
see also: http://www.niact.org.uk/content/view/27/41/ |
|
|
Written by Administrator
|
|
Nov 11, 2008 at 10:27 PM |
|
The Assembly yesterday passed an Ulster Unionist motion to retain the 11+. Basil McCrea who, along with party colleague Ken Robinson, forwarded the motion, said that neither he nor his party wished to see the 11+ remaining any longer than it had to. Their concern was for teachers, parents and the children working towards transfer next year.
"Teachers and parents of Year 6 children want - and need - certainty about the post-primary transfer procedure their children will face," he said.
"It is the duty and responsibility of the Education Minister to deliver that certainty.
"Instead of certainty, however, the minister has delivered anxiety, unease and the threat of chaos. Three months into the present Year 6, parents and teachers still - still - do not know what transfer procedure children will face next year."
In the absence of anything else, retaining the 11+ is the Assembly's preferred solution.
Last week the four main churches proposed increasing the age of transfer to 14. Caitriana Ruane welcomed their input saying: "There is still time to reach a consensus, but we also need to bring an early conclusion to this debate and bring clarity to teachers, parents and pupils."
In an article in the Irish News last week education correspondent Simon Doyle pointed out that after months of saying "let me be clear" Ruane's call for clarity is baffling. In July after criticism from Catholic bishops she said: “I have brought forward very clear proposals. People have claimed they didn’t have clarity. They now have clarity.” It is difficult to know who other than the minister herself can bring the clarity she is now asking for. |
|
Last Updated ( Nov 11, 2008 at 11:46 PM )
|
|
|
|
<< Start < Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next > End >>
|